Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 F.1d 441 - Arbitman v. Woodside

Arbitman v. Woodside’s Empirical Analysis

258 F. 441 · 1919

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
January 1952
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1952 · most notably Hirabayashi v. United States (1943), Rase v. United States (1942)

10 federal appellate · 5 district ·

25019191920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ju Toy · Low Wah Suey v. Backus · Lewis v. Frick · Tang Tun v. Harry Edsell · Angelus v. Sullivan

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.