Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

258 F. 989

Docket No. 141.

The Bris

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1919.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1919-04-22

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit in admiralty by the Standard Varnish Works against the steamship Bris; Rederiaktiebolaget, claimant. Decree for claimant, and libelant appeals.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1991

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on The Bris

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1919-04-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit in admiralty by the Standard Varnish Works against the steamship Bris; Rederiaktiebolaget, claimant. Decree for claimant, and libelant appeals.

¶2Affirmed.

¶3For opinion below, see 253 Fed. 259.

¶4Julius J. Frank, of New York City, for appellant.

¶5Haight, Sandford & Smith, of New York City, for appellee.

¶6Before ROGERS and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

¶7PER CURIAM.

¶8Decree affirmed.

/258/f1d/989 · .json · Public domain