Rustad v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
258 F.2d 563 · 1958
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1989
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 48 U.S.C. § 101 · 48 U.S.C. § 226
Relies on Connally v. General Construction Co. · Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States · Gates v. Henderson · Booth Fisheries Co. v. United States · James B. Doyle v. Oliver A. Fox, J. E. Patterson and Corey Gabrielson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.