United States v. Lev’s Empirical Analysis
258 F.2d 9 · 1958
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 1976
15 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Berger v. United States · Jencks v. United States · Blumenthal v. United States · Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Federal Power Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a written statement made by said witness and signed or otherwise adopted or approved by him; or “ ‘(2) a stenographic, mechanical, electrical, or other recording, or a transcription thereof, which is a substantially verbatim recital of an oral statement made by said witness to an agent of the Government and recorded contemporaneously with the making of such oral statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.