Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 F.3d 385 - Total Minatome Corp. v. Jack/Wade Drilling, Inc.

Total Minatome Corp. v. Jack/Wade Drilling, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

258 F.3d 385 · 2001

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably Gerhardt v. R, Carrieri v. Jobs.Com Inc. (2004)

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

370200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 507

Relies on Vaughan v. Atkinson · Nathanson v. National Labor Relations Board · Reading Company v. Brown · Woburn Associates v. Kahn · Pro-Snax Distributors Inc Andrews Kurth Llp v. Family Snacks Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “After notice and a hearing, there shall be allowed administrative expenses, other than claims allowed under section 502(f) of this title, including— (1)(A) the actual, necessary costs and expenses of preserving the estate, including wages, salaries, or commissions for services rendered after the commencement of the case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. McBride v. Riley (In re Riley) · Nabors Offshore Corp. v. Whistler Energy II (In re Whistler Energy II, L. L.C.)
  2. “post-petition and as a result of actions taken by the”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Szwak v. Earwood · Nabors Offshore Corp. v. Whistler Energy II (In re Whistler Energy II, L. L.C.)
  3. “[t]he words `actual' and `necessary' have been construed narrowly: `the debt must benefit [the] estate and its creditors.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Nabors Offshore Corp. v. Whistler Energy II (In re Whistler Energy II, L. L.C.) · In Re Asarco, LLC

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.