Christopher Corroon v. John Reeve’s Empirical Analysis
258 F.3d 86 · 2001
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. Roper · United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[B]ecause more than one entity was sanctioned, [the sanctioned law firm] surely could not be viewed as an appellant, for it is not ‘a party whose intent to appeal is otherwise clear from the notice.’ ” (quoting Fed. R.App. P. 3(c)(4))). Similar to Corroon , the notice of appeal in this case states only that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Rule 11 is violated when it is clear under existing precedents that a pleading has no chance of success and there is no reasonable argument to extend, modify, or reverse the law as it stands.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.