Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 F.3d 930 - Karluk Mayweathers

Karluk Mayweathers’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
December 2024
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Freedom Bapt. Church of Del. v. Tp. of Middletown (2002), Glow Industries, Inc. v. Lopez (2002)

1 district ·

160200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Turner v. Safley · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz · Page v. Torrey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may not materially alter the status of the case on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The named plaintiffs either face or have faced the choice between following work incentive program rules and obeying the Qur’an. Prison officials do not argue that the named plaintiffs are somehow immune from having to work on Fridays in the future. The prisoners have standing to seek injunctive relief, and a holding to the contrary would allow prison officials to defeat prisoners’ claims simply by changing individual plaintiffs’ work schedules as soon as they file suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “utterly failed to show any ripple effect among inmates and staff from the narrow scope of the injunction. Prison administrators have implemented the injunction by logging inmates’ unexcused absences as always; the only change is that unexcused absences attributable to Jumu'ah attendance are off bounds to the disciplinary ‘ process ... [T]he absence of Muslim inmates for about one hour on Fridays only will not disrupt the operation of the work incentive program.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.