Riley v. UOP LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1920
Relies on Cengr v. Fusibond Piping Systems, Inc. · Manley v. City of Chicago · Majeske v. City of Chicago · McIlveen v. Stone Container Corp. · Tidemann v. Nadler Golf Car Sales, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“would have sufficed. See id. These pre-trial transcript costs will not be allowed. E. Copying and Exemplification The Court may allow costs fees for copying and exemplification of papers necessarily obtained for use in the case. 28 U.S.C. § 1920 (4). But to receive its copying costs, LaPorta must”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the regular copy rate as established by the Judicial Conference of the United States and in effect at the time the transcript or deposition was filed unless some other rate was previously provided for by order of court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.