Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 ILLAPP3D 534 - People v. Fox

People v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
May 2001
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 145 Ill. 2d 209 - People v. P.H. · 76 Ill. 2d 204 - In Re Greene · 127 Ill. 2d 486 - People v. DeJesus · 2 Ill. App. 3d 285 - People v. Henderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Defendant misrepresented his age to the police and a probation officer and never made his age an issue until after he was found guilty. Defendant will not be permitted to proceed through adult criminal proceedings then demand a new trial in juvenile court upon an unfavorable outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.