Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 Ind. 363 - Eskridge v. State

Eskridge v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably State v. Zayas (1985), 157 Ind. App. 59 - Guyton v. State (1973)

32 state decisions

17019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Fay v. Noia · Ashe v. Swenson · Benton v. Maryland · Carnley v. Cochran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the State should have had an opportunity to supply such insufficiency or reopen the case for that purpose, even after it had rested, since a trial is not a game of technicalities, but one in which the facts and truth are sought.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““(c) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or have under his control, with intent to violate any provision of this act, any hypodermic syringe or needle or any instrument adapted for the use of narcotic drugs by injection in a human being.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.