Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 Ind. 383 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 1996

19 state decisions

130197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · Lambert v. State · Doss v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[I]t has been held that if the defense under the affidavit as it originally stood would be equally available after the amendment is made, and if any evidence the accused might have would be equally applicable to the affidavit in one form as in the other, the amendment is one of form and not of substance. Smith v. State (1969), 252 Ind. 148 , 246 N.E.2d 765 ; State ex rel. Kaufman v. Gould (1951), 229 Ind. 288 , 98 N.E.2d 184 . Also see, 42 C.J.S. Indictments and Informations, § 240, p. 1250.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.