Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 Ind. 648 - Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
2
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably Albright v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fetters (1980), Murphy v. State (1977)

3 federal appellate · 83 state decisions

4701972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New v. State · Jackson v. State · Liston v. State · Butler v. State · Valentine v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[plrima facie means such evidence as is sufficient to establish a given fact and which will remain sufficient if uncontradicted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court has stated that we will not weigh the evidence on appeal nor will we determine the credibility of witnesses. Only that evidence most favorable to the State and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom will be considered. As long as there is substantial evidence of probative value sufficient to establish every material element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, the judgment will not be disturbed. Jackson v. State (1971), [257] Ind. [477], 275 N.E.2d 538 ; Daniels v. State (1971), [257] Ind. [376], 274 N.E.2d 702 ; Valentine v. State (1971), [257] Ind. [197], 273 N.E.2d 543 .” See also, Liston v. State (1969), 252 Ind. 502, 506 , 250 N.E.2d 739 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “manifest abuse of discretion before the judge's ruling will be disturbed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.