In Re Caller’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Schmidt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that petitioner (1) forged a deceased client's signature to his will, (2) forged the signatures of the witnesses to the will, (3) notarized the forged signatures, (4) offered the forged will for probate, (5) transported witnesses to testify in support of the will, and (6) attempted to settle the matter in part to avoid disclosure of the forgeries.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Grant“agonized over a recommended disposition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Grant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.