Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

258 Ky. 724

81 S.W.2d 571

Mattingly v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · decided 1935-04-16

Relies on Ledington v. Commonwealth

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1935-04-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 2013

3 state decisions

20193519401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner—

¶2 Dismissing appeal.

¶3 The appeal by Floyd Mattingly is from a judgment sentencing him to the penitentiary for 18 years for manslaughter.

¶4 The bill of exceptions was filed in the circuit court •on September 11, 1934, but was not filed in this court until- December 20, 1934, or 101 days thereafter. The right of appeal in a criminal case is conditioned upon *725 the record being lodged in the office of the clerk of the Court of Appeals within 60 days after judgment, or, if time be given beyond the term at which the judgment is rendered, to present a bill of exceptions upon the filing of the record in the office of the clerk of this court within 60 days after it is made a part of the record in the trial court. Section 336, Criminal Code of Practice; Ledington v. Commonwealth, 256 Ky. 678, 76 S. W. (2d) 910. The motion of the Attorney General to dismiss this appeal because of the delay must therefore be sustained.

¶5 For the satisfaction of appellant and his counsel, we may add, however, that a consideration of the record, notwithstanding the delay, does not reveal a reversible, error.

¶6 Appeal dismissed.

/258/ky/724 · .json · Public domain