Gollner v. Cram’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2011
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Stevenson · Todhunter v. Smith · Gammel v. Ernst & Ernst · United States v. Silliman · Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The policy requiring that every party be given his “day in court” should not, of course, be defeated by an arbitrary application of the doctrine of res judicata.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.