Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 MO 26 - Jeude v. Sims

Jeude v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
4
states following
July 1988
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently July 1988 · most notably Casper v. Lee (1952), Lamb v. State of Florida (1926)

2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

14019141920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cross v. Gould · Wait v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Curtis v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. · In re Toney · Reed v. Bright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In all cases, except those provided for by these statutes, a court has no authority to disturb its judgment after the lapse of the term. This has been so universally ruled, that citations would be to become superfluous. “The defendants, therefore, are in no position to lay hold of either of these two statutes, and the original judgment was .wrongfully set aside after the lapse of the term, unless such action can be upheld upon one of the other two theories remaining to be discussed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * General rules of court, like general principles of law, are subject to exceptions when justice cries out for the exception. Court rules are mere ends to the attainment of justice, and are not to be twisted into instruments of injustice. Courts, about the exalted office of dispensing justice, are not to have their functions starved and atrophied by a mere phrase or rule, in an exceptional case calling for a suspension of the rule as a debt due to justice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.