Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 MO 686 - Davis v. Carp

Davis v. Carp’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
May 1987
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 1987

4 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

4019141920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Amy v. City of Watertown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If any person, by absconding or concealing himself, or by any other improper act, prevent the commencement of an action, such action may be commenced within the time herein limited, after the commencement of such action shall have ceased to be so prevented.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““•The ‘improper act’ referred to in the statute must be one in the nature of a fraud that would prevent the commencement of the action, in order to bring the act within the statute.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.