258 N.C. App. 408 - Holton v. Holton’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stanback v. Stanback · Forbis v. Neal · In Re the Will of Jones · 147 N.C. App. 52 - Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. Slavin · Dobson v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nlike a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, the court need not confine its evaluation of a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to the face of the pleadings, but may review or accept any evidence, such as affidavits, or it may hold an evidentiary hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“While we apply a de novo standard when reviewing either a Rule 12(b)(1) or 12(b)(6) dismissal, identifying the precise civil procedure rule underlying a dismissal is critical because it dictates our scope of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The scope of our review is 'whether, as a matter of law, the allegations of the complaint, treated as true, are sufficient to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under some legal theory.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.