258 N.C. App. 435 - In re: E.D.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “in cases where a respondent [who is involuntarily committed to a State health facility] does not receive an examination by a second physician as mandated by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 122C-266(a), the respondent is not required to make a showing of prejudice resulting from the statutory violation in order to have the trial court's order authorizing her continued commitment vacated.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re E.D.

2. “Spencer cannot be read as standing for the entirely separate proposition that in cases where-as here-the second examination requirement of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 122C-266(a) clearly has not been followed, a respondent must nevertheless show prejudice stemming from her failure to receive a second examination.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re E.D.

3. “Here, respondent concedes that Dr. Saeed's testimony illustrates that he conducted an examination of respondent on 23 July 2013, the day after he was admitted to Holly Hill Hospital.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re E.D.