Parde v. Parde’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably Harris v. Harris (2001), Heald v. Heald (2000)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davidson v. Davidson · 180 N.J. Super. 210 - Amato v. Amato · Van Newkirk v. Van Newkirk · Pope v. Pope · Shockley v. Shockley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“compensation for an injury that a spouse has or will receive for pain, suffering, disfigurement, disability, or loss of post-divorce earning capacity should not equitably be included in the marital estate. On the other hand, compensation for past wages, medical expenses, and other items that compensate for the diminution of the marital estate should equitably be included in the marital estate as they properly replace losses of property created by the marital partnership.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n the analytical approach, courts analyze the nature and underlying reasons for the compensation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.