Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 Neb. 1017 - Meints v. Meints

Meints v. Meints’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
4
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Harris v. Harris (2001), Heald v. Heald (2000)

49 state decisions

320200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thiltges v. Thiltges · Hajenga v. Hajenga · 284 Ill. App. 3d 339 - In Re Marriage of Charles · Parde v. Parde · Black v. Black

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When dissolution of a marriage is decreed, the court may order payment of such alimony by one party to the other and division of property as may be reasonable, having regard for the circumstances of the parties, duration of the marriage, a history of the contributions to the marriage by each party, including contributions to the care and education of the children, and interruption of personal careers or educational opportunities, and the ability of the supported party to engage in gainful employment without interfering with the interests of any minor children in the custody of such party. . . . ... The purpose of alimony is to provide for the continued maintenance or support of one party by the other when the relative economic circumstances and the other criteria enumerated in this section make it appropriate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.