Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 NW2D 122 - State v. Columbus

State v. Columbus’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2012

21 state decisions

13019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullaney v. Wilbur · Hankerson v. North Carolina · State v. Johnson · State v. White · State v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) absence of aggression or provocation on the part of the slayer; (2) actual and honest belief of the slayer that he was in imminent danger of some felony and that it was necessary to take the action he did; (3) existence of reasonable grounds for such belief; and (4) duty of the slayer to retreat or avoid the danger if reasonably possible.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “burden of going forward with evidence to support his claim of self-defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The intentional taking of the life of another is not authorized by section 609.-06, except when necessary in resisting or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death, or preventing the commission of a felony in the actor’s place of abode.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.