Halsey v. Winant’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 2 district · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States v. McCombs (1994), People ex rel. Portnoy v. Strasser (1952)
18 federal appellate · 2 district · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. . Van Vechten · Hubbard v. Tod · Huntington v. . Attrill · Wheelock v. . Lee · Merchants Exchange National Bank v. Commercial Warehouse Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * Every conveyance made and every obligation incurred by a person who is or will be thereby rendered insolvent is fraudulent as to creditors without regard to his actual intent if the conveyance is made or the obligation is incurred without a fair consideration.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Neal v. Clark · Damazo v. Wahby““Where a conveyance ... is fraudulent as to a creditor, such creditor, when his claim has matured, may, as against any person except a purchaser for fair consideration without knowledge of the fraud at the time of the purchase ... (a) have the conveyance set aside . . . . ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]hat constitutes fair consideration under [section 272] must be determined upon the facts and circumstances of each particular case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.