¶1 Judgment reversed, with costs in the Appellate Division and in this court. (See Middleworth v. Ordway, 191 N. Y. 404; Ansley v. Ansley, 154 Ga. 357); no opinion.
¶2 Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
258 N.Y. 595
180 N.E 348
Decided February 9, 1932
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1932-02-09
Relies on Middleworth v. . Ordway · Ansley v. Ansley
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1932-02-09
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1993
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Judgment reversed, with costs in the Appellate Division and in this court. (See Middleworth v. Ordway, 191 N. Y. 404; Ansley v. Ansley, 154 Ga. 357); no opinion.
¶2 Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.