Minihan v. Stiglich’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"1. The issue in the two proceedings is identical. "2. The issue was actually litigated and was essential to a final decision on the merits in the prior proceeding. "3. The party sought to be precluded has had a full and fair opportunity to be heard on that issue. "4. The party sought to be precluded was a party or was in privity with a party to the prior proceeding. "5. The prior proceeding was the type of proceeding to which this court will give preclusive effect."”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Dauven v. U.S. Bancorp · 295 Or. App. 370 - State v. Manwiller

2. “Under the doctrine of issue preclusion, a party is bound by the determination of a particular issue in an earlier proceeding.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Dauven v. U.S. Bancorp

3. “4. The party sought to be precluded was a party or was in privity with a party to the prior proceeding.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 295 Or. App. 370 - State v. Manwiller