Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 Pa. Super. 101 - Commonwealth v. McIntosh

258 Pa. Super. 101 - Commonwealth v. McIntosh’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 1991
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 1991

12 state decisions

60197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. Mack · Commonwealth v. Cheeks · Commonwealth v. Pronkoskie · Commonwealth v. Coleman · Commonwealth v. Cooley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . .a spontaneous declaration by a person whose mind has been suddenly made subject to an overpowering emotion caused by some unexpected and shocking occurrence, which that person has just participated in or closely witnessed, and made in reference to some phase of that occurrence which he perceived, and this declaration must be made so near the occurrence both in time and place as to exclude the likelihood of its having emanated in whole or in part from his reflective faculties.” Commonwealth v. Coleman, 458 Pa. 112, 115-16 , 326 A.2d 387, 388-89 (1974) quoting Allen v. Mack, 345 Pa. 407, 410 , 28 A.2d 783, 784 (1942).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Nowalk did not create a new res gestae rule allowing admission of a child declarant's out of court statement regardless of when and under what conditions it was made so long as it was made to the child's parent at the child's first opportunity to be alone with the parent. To apply such a rule is to misapply Nowalk and the res gestae exception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “There is not, and should not be, an `earliest opportunity exception' to the hearsay rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.