Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 So. 2d 11 - Gable v. Silver

258 So. 2d 11 - Gable v. Silver’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
12
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

1 district · 55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably 115 Wash. 2d 506 - ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co. (1990), 76 Ill. 2d 31 - Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co. (1979)

1 district · 55 state decisions — followed in 12 states

23019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co. · Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc. · Ethel Javins v. First National Realty Corporation, Rudolph Saunders v. First National Realty Corporation, Stanley Gross v. First National Realty Corporation · Carpenter v. Donohoe · Waggoner v. Midwestern Development, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “brings the law much closer to the realities of the market for new homes than does the anachronistic maxim of caveat emptor.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““We also realize and memorialize that our facts limit our decision to the sale of new homes or condominiums.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “present day trends, logic and practical justice in realty dealings.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.