Schooley v. Wetstone’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1998
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lanier v. Overstreet · 251 So. 2d 665 - Carroll v. State · 173 So. 2d 164 - Matheson v. Elcook · Conrad v. Sapp · 250 So. 2d 913 - Smith v. Ring
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[3] The contention by appellants that the primary use of the lands is for speculative purposes is of no consequence if its actiial use is for a bona fide agricultural purpose. Lanier v. Overstreet, Fla.1965, 175 So.2d 521 ; Matheson v. Elcook, Fla.App.1965, 173 So.2d 164 ; Smith v. Ring, Fla.App.1971, 250 So.2d 913 ; McKinney v. Hunt, Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 6 ; St. Joe Paper Company v. Mickler, Fla.1971, 252 So.2d 225 ; Conrad v. Sapp, Fla.1971, 252 So.2d 225 ; cf. Greenwood v. Oates, Fla.1971, 251 So.2d 665 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Chapman v. Cassady
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.