WM. Cameron & Co. v. Abbott’s Empirical Analysis
1924
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2011
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cole v. Cunningham · Commercial Mutual Accident Co. v. Davis · Sandage v. Studabaker Bros. Manufacturing Co. · Reed's Administratrix v. Illinois Central Railroad · Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Exemption laws are local and “pertain to the remedy having no extraterritorial effect.” The framers of the Constitution and the lawmakers in defining a homestead were evidently not attempting to say what should be the homestead in some other state.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Drenttel · In Re Ginther““They are correct, however, we think in the holding that the homestead exemption laws of the state are to be construed as applying only to homestead property within such state.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Peters
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.