Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 S.W.2d 823 - Rees v. State

Rees v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1963
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gulbenkian v. Penn · Burtis v. Butler Bros. · Lokey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The State then came forward with proof in the form of a certificate by the Superintendent of the Austin State School showing that the guardian was indebted to the State in the sum of $3,589.40. By reason of the express provisions of Article 3202-a, that certificate was 'sufficient evidence to au-thorise the Court to render judgment.’ Were those all the facts, the State at that point would be entitled to a summary judgment.” (Emphasis ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.