Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 SW3D 38 - In Re Belz

In Re Belz’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Larsen · In Re Oberhellmann · Matter of Mendell · In Re Snyder · In Re Maier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Suspension is generally appropriate when a lawyer knows that he or she is violating a court order or rule, and causes injury or potential injury to a client or other party, or causes interference or potential interference with the legal proceeding”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Mitigating factors do not constitute a defense to a finding of misconduct. But they may justify a downward departure from the presumptively proper discipline.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “full and free disclosure to disciplinary board or cooperative attitude during proceedings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.