Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 258 U.S. 377 - Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad’s Empirical Analysis

258 U.S. 377 · 1922

Citation profile

1,128
cited by 1,128 later decisions
58
cited 58 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

358 federal appellate · 167 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,128 later decisions (58 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Minnesota v. United States (1939), General Inv Co v. Lake Shore & M S Ry Co (1922)

358 federal appellate · 167 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 12 states

358019221930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBaltimore & O. R. v. Lambert Run Coal Co. (from Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co. · American Well Works Company v. Layne & Bowler Company E · Interstate Commerce Commission v. Illinois Central Railroad · State of Louisiana v. William Gibbs McAdoo

Cited together with General Inv Co v. Lake Shore & M S Ry Co · Freeman v. Bee Machine Co. · Minnesota v. United States · American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · Venner v. Michigan Central Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,128 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The jurisdiction of the federal court on removal is, in a limited sense, a derivative jurisdiction. If the state court lacks jurisdiction of the subject-matter or of the parties, the federal court acquires none, although it might in a like suit originally brought there have had jurisdiction.””
    40 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.