Mitchell v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1954
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Heintz v. Schenck · Geyer v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although the jury found Mitchell negligent as to speed, it found specifically that such speed was not an efficient cause which produced the collision. In spite of that finding it apportioned twenty per cent of the combined negligence to the plaintiff George Mitchell. This was an inconsistent verdict, and a new trial is required.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wojan v. Igl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.