Binder v. Ben Rubin, Inc.

¶1Order, entered on reargument, denying defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We affirm the order on the ground that plaintiff made a sufficient showing that defendant is about to dispose of its property with intent to defraud creditors. (Wildman v. Van Gelder, 60 Hun, 443.) The casé should be tried without further delay. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.