Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 ALA 379 - Griffith v. White

Griffith v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2002

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

20195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fleishbein v. Western Auto Supply Agency · Nevitt v. Bacon · Staten v. Shumate · Barrentine v. Parker · Liles, Et Ux. v. Savage

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the absence of statute, a party cannot deduct from the period of the statute of limitations applicable to his case the time consumed by the pendency of an action in which he sought to have the matter adjudicated, but which was dismissed without prejudice as to him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.