Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 Ala. 415 - Myhand v. State

Myhand v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 1997
most recently cited

107 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1997 · most notably Culombe v. Connecticut (1961), Duncan v. State (1965)

107 state decisions

46019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Phillips v. State · Johnson v. State · Parsons v. State · Daniels v. State · Robinson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well established by our cases that extrajudicial confessions are prima facie involuntary and inadmissible and the duty rests in the first instance on the trial court to determine whether or not a confession is voluntary and unless it so appears it should not be admitted.” Lokos, supra.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We cannot agree with the position taken by counsel for appellant for two reasons; first, the evidence as it bears on the taking of the ‘smears’ fully supports the finding that appellant was not forced or coerced to permit the smears to be made. It appears from his own testimony that he was perfectly willing to submit to the tests. The evidence supports a finding that appellant was not compelled or induced to submit to the tests by threats or promises and the mere fact that the tests were made in the presence of officers of the law does not, in our opinion, conclusively show that appellant did not voluntarily permit the tests to be made. See Potter v. State, 92 Ala. 37 , 9 So. 402 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““I am sure you are not going to let the people in the community down; you are not going to let this crowd down.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.