Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 ARK 123 - Queary v. State

Queary v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2020

12 state decisions

80197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zuback v. Bakmaz · Connelly v. State · Page v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a witness, in response to a proper question gives a nonresponsive answer stating matter that is incompetent and inadmissible as evidence, the trial court, on motion, should strike out the answer or so much of it as is improper and direct the jury to disregard it as evidence in the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.