Danning v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
259 F.2d 305 · 1958
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2007
12 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 104 · 11 U.S.C. § 108
Relies on United States v. Sherwood · United States v. United Mine Workers of America · United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · United States v. Shaw · Minnesota v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Suits by the receiver and the trustee shall be brought or prosecuted only in the courts where the bankrupt might have brought or prosecuted them if proceedings under this title had not been instituted, unless by consent of the defendant, except as provided in sections 96, 107, and 110 of this title.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“affirmative recovery against the sovereign is not a corollary of the sovereign's right to sue or present a claim for bankruptcy adjudication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 80-3768
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.