Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 F.2d 59 - Salisbury v. Tibbetts

Salisbury v. Tibbetts’s Empirical Analysis

259 F.2d 59 · 1958

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
June 1973
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1973

8 federal appellate ·

60195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Bridges v. United States · Healy v. Commissioner · Nevada Half Moon Mining Co. v. Combined Metals Reduction Co. · H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Diffie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An accord is an agreement whereby one of the parties undertakes to give or perform, and the other to accept in satisfaction of a claim, liquidated or in dispute and arising either from contract or from tort, something other than or different from what he is or considers himself entitled to. And a satisfaction is the execution of such agreement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.