Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 F.3d 154 - Kenneth Newton

Kenneth Newton’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

276
cited by 276 later decisions
12
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 72 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 276 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation. (2006), Visa Check/mastermoney Antitrust Litigation v. Usa

1 federal appellate · 72 district · 22 state decisions — followed in 12 states

1520200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Basic Inc. v. Levinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 276 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all only if (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
    38 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “One sound basis for granting jurisdiction under Rule 23(f) is... the circumstance that the class certification `places inordinate or hydraulic pressure on defendants to settle, avoiding the risk, however small, of potentially ruinous liability.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[B]ecause the determination of a certification request invariably involves some examination of factual and legal issues underlying the plaintiffs' cause of action, a court may consider the substantive elements of the plaintiff's case . . . .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.