Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 F.3d 725 - In Re: Alphonso Michael Espy

In Re: Alphonso Michael Espy’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
February 2012
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Morrison v. Olson · In Re Oliver L. North (Omnibus Order) · In re Sealed Motion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the subjects of the investigation have already been disclosed to the public; (2) whether the subjects do not object to the filings being released to the public; (3) whether the filings contain information which is already publicly known[;] and (4) whether the [cjourt filings consist of legal or factual rulings in a case which should be publicly available to understand the court’s rules and precedents or to follow developments in a particular matter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the functions that the Special Division is empowered to perform . . . to functions that federal judges perform in other contexts, such as deciding whether to allow disclosure of matters occurring before the grand jury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Disclosure otherwise prohibited by this rule of matters occurring before the grand jury may also be made (I) when so directed by a court preliminary to or in connection with a judicial proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.