Wright v. Linkus Enterprises, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 216
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert · Blackie v. Barrack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) the nature of the action; (ii) the definition of the class certified; (iii) the class claims, issues, or defenses; (iv) that a class member may enter an appearance through an attorney if the member so desires; (v) that the court will exclude from the class any member who requests exclusion; (vi) the time and manner for requesting exclusion; [and] (vii) the binding effect of a class judgment on members under Rule 23(e)(3).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.