259 F. Supp. 2d 418 - Constanza v. Riley’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1631 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 48 U.S.C. § 1662 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Deboris Calcano-Martinezs v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Miller v. Albright · Leszek Hughes v. John Ashcroft Attorney General · United States v. Morin · Abel Chaves Baeta v. Roseanne C. Sonchik Immigration and Naturalization Service
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.