Mace v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1002 · 38 U.S.C. § 4301 · 38 U.S.C. § 4303 · 38 U.S.C. § 4311 · 38 U.S.C. § 4312 · 38 U.S.C. § 4316 · 38 U.S.C. § 4323 · 38 U.S.C. § 4331
Relies on Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston · Sheehan v. Department of the Navy · Francis v. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc. · Clegg v. Arkansas Department of Correction · Kay v. General Cable Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n employer shall be deemed to have engaged in actions prohibited ... under subsection (a), if the person's membership [or] ... service in the uniformed services is a motivating factor in the employer's action, unless the employer can prove that the action would have been taken in the absence of such membership ... or ... service.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Remedies available for violations of USERRA include: (1) injunctive relief, (2) lost wages or benefits suffered as a result of a USERRA violation, and (3) liquidated damages in an amount equal to the amount of lost wages or benefits if the employer's violation was willful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[m]erely knowing that a military beneficiary was asserting a USERRA claim is not, by itself, reckless disregard where, for example, the employer's decision was based on the exercise of a business judgment such as the employer's financial hardship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.