Nguti v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Zadvydas v. Davis · Demore District Director San Francisco District of Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v. Kim · Department of the Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairss v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association · Department of Health & Human Services v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he alien must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the officer that such release would not pose a danger to property or persons, and that the alien is likely to appear for any future proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the detainee must be admitted to bail unless the government establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the immigrant poses a risk of flight or a risk of danger to the community.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“makes it highly unlikely that the Second Circuit would disagree with affording § 1226(a) detainees the exact same procedural protection it afforded a § 1226(c) detainee in Lora .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.