Henderson v. Millner Developments, LLC.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Greene v. Hundley · 231 Ga. App. 596 - Haddon v. Shaheen & Co. · Progressive Data System, Inc. v. Jefferson Randolph Corp. · 242 Ga. App. 753 - Sweatt v. International Development Corp. · 177 Ga. App. 199 - Broadcast Corp. of Ga. v. SUBSCRIPTION TV.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Overstepping’ like the other grounds for vacating arbitration awards is very limited in scope. ‘Overstepping’ has been described as ‘addressing issues not properly before the arbitrator.’ ” (Citations omitted.) Haddon v. Shaheen & Co., 231 Ga. App. 596, 598 (1) (b) ( 499 SE2d 693 ) (1998). Thus, this ground does not apply where an issue is properly raised before the arbitrator. Progressive Data Systems v. Jefferson Randolph Corp., 275 Ga. 420, 421 ( 568 SE2d 474 ) (2002).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.