Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 Ga. App. 74 - Wright v. State

259 Ga. App. 74 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. State · Gilstrap v. State · 173 Ga. App. 254 - Cooper v. State · 234 Ga. App. 348 - McClarity v. State · 249 Ga. App. 156 - Arnold v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Severance is required if offenses are joined solely because they are similar in nature. Severance is not mandated, however, where the similarity of the offenses is coupled with evidence of a pattern which shows a common motive, plan, scheme, or bent of mind. Where the modus operandi of the perpetrator is so strikingly alike, that the totality of the facts unerringly demonstrate and designate the defendant as the common perpetrator, the offenses may be joined—subject to the right of the defendant to severance in the interests of justice. Severance in this particular kind of circumstance lies within the sound discretion of the trial judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Child molestation advances to aggravated child molestation with the addition of either physical injury to the child or sodomy. Sodomy, in turn, is defined as `any sexual act involving the sex organs of one person and the mouth or anus of another.' [OCGA § 16-6-2(a).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]hen the evidence shows completion only of the greater offense, it is unnecessary for the trial court to charge on the lesser offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.