Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 259 ILL 382 - Domm v. Hollenbeck

Domm v. Hollenbeck’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
8
states following
August 1992
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 1992 · most notably 36 Ill. App. 3d 130 - Nelson v. Lewis (1976), Andrews v. Jordan Marsh Co. (1933)

30 state decisions

70191319201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bishop v. Hilliard · Stumps v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The owner or keeper of a domestic animal of a species not inclined to mischief, such as dogs, horses, and oxen, is not liable for any injury committed by it to the person of another, unless it be shown that the animal had a mischievous propensity to commit such an injury, and the owner had notice of it, or that the injury was attributable to some other neglect on his part. If the owner of a vicious animal knows its character and disposition to commit injury to mankind he is liable for all injuries it may inflict.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There is no rule as to the number of instances of a mischievous disposition shown by a dog to constitute notice, and if it were proved and not denied that a dog had attacked some person or manifested a disposition to do so it might be sufficient, and evidence that he acted peaceably at some other time would not tend to disprove the specific act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Proof may be made by evidence of facts and circumstances from which an inference of knowledge arises.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.