State v. LaMunyon’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably State v. Smith (1999), State v. Kelly (2014)
2 federal appellate · 58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Weaver v. Graham · McKeiver v. Pennsylvania · Scott v. Illinois · Nichols v. United States · Baldasar v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““it is well established that a juvenile adjudication is not a ‘criminal conviction’. . . . When specifying in the KSGA, that ‘criminal history’ includes specific juvenile adjudications, and criminal convictions (see K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4703[d]), the Kansas Legislature was aware that a juvenile adjudication was not a criminal conviction. . . . The mere fact that a juvenile adjudication is not a criminal conviction does not prohibit using a juvenile adjudication in calculating a criminal history score for purposes of sentencing an adult under the KSGA.” [Citations omitted.] 259 Kan. at 59 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lanning““Due process does not require that a defendant be informed of all collateral consequences which may result from a guilty plea. [Citation omitted.] One of the collateral consequences of which a defendant need not be informed is the possibility that the conviction may be used to enhance the sentence for a later crime. [Citations omitted.]” 259 Kan. at 62 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sedillos“a juvenile adjudication is not a 'criminal conviction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re M.M.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.