Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

259 Kan. 644

In re Butcher

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 15, 1996

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1996-04-15

Decided 1996-04-15

¶1In a letter dated March 28, 1996, to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, respondent Robert W. Butcher, of Kansas City, Kansas, an attorney admitted to practice law in the state of Kansas, voluntarily surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 217 (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 219).

¶2At the time respondent surrendered his license, there were seven separate complaints scheduled for hearing on May 8 and 9, 1996, before a panel of the Kansas- Board for Discipline of Attorneys. Four additional complaints had been received and docketed and were being investigated by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator. The complaints set for hearing on May 8 and 9, 1996, contained allegations of fading to return client files after respondent’s legal services had been terminated, failing to provide an accounting to clients of funds in respondent’s possession, failing to communicate with clients, failing to handle in a diligent fashion matters entrusted to respondent, preparing a journal entry containing false information and forging the signatures of a district judge and opposing counsel on the journal entry, and misrepresenting to a client and the court that a civil case had been settled when it had not.

¶3This court, having examined the files of the office of the Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the surrender of respondent’s license should be accepted and that respondent should be disbarred.

¶4It Is Therefore Ordered that Robert W. Butcher be and he is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Kansas and his license and privilege to practice law are hereby revoked.

¶5It Is Further Ordered that the Clerk of the Appellate Courts strike the name of Robert W. Butcher from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in Kansas.

¶6It Is Further Ordered that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports, that the costs herein shall be assessed to respondent, and that respondent forthwith shall comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (1995 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 222).

/259/kan/644 · .json · Public domain